This photo:
exemplifies what a travel website (which this photo is originally from) is looking for in a picture. The cherry blossoms, the traditional building, and most of all, no crowds. It's very rare to see a picture of a traditional shrine or sight-seeing location with crowds of people, despite the fact that many locations are overcrowded with tourists. The photograph is recognizably Japanese, and can stand on it's own as a promotional image without any words or description.
There's no image of Japan that's complete without a scenic shot of Fuji san in the background. This image particularly also contains a side shot of a pagoda and beautiful shot of tree tops. This photograph is more traditional, as the first image, again with no existence of people. Another interesting observation is that no matter what, almost all images of Japan have a solid blue sky, with little to no clouds. This is very enticing, and almost looks fake, but in reality the sky in Japan is almost always a solid blue. This is a very small detail, but something that demonstrates the beauty of Japan.
On the complete other side of these images, this photograph of the a city is enticing in a different way. This is an overhead image taken of the Shibuya Scramble, the busiest tourist center. In this photograph, it's important to demonstrate the large crowds, because that itself is the draw of this area (not to mention 109). It's also a separation from the typical traditional pictures used by travel websites.
I like what you said about the artificial/staged feel of the first two shots, especially regarding the lack of crowds and clouds. There's a strange myth perpetuated in these touristy photos: everything in this exotic place you want to go to has perfect conditions for your visit. In that sense, these photos are both super enticing and off-putting (if we understand why they're constructed as they are).
ReplyDeleteThere was a great flow in your blog post. It felt natural as well as insightful about Japanese culture as well. I think that there could have been a bit more contrast to the the types of pictures that you used since there were two pictures of temples, but that is just a nitpick. This was a really great post and it was really informational.
ReplyDelete